1) the numerator and/or denominator might be 0, in that case fall back to the default frame interval. This is per the spec and this caused a v4l2-compliance failure. 2) the updated frame interval wasn't returned in the s_frame_interval subdev op. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c index 6011cec5e351..a9304b98f7af 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c @@ -1235,6 +1235,8 @@ static int imx274_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, ret = imx274_set_frame_interval(imx274, fi->interval); if (!ret) { + fi->interval = imx274->frame_interval; + /* * exposure time range is decided by frame interval * need to update it after frame interval changes @@ -1730,9 +1732,9 @@ static int imx274_set_frame_interval(struct stimx274 *priv, __func__, frame_interval.numerator, frame_interval.denominator); - if (frame_interval.numerator == 0) { - err = -EINVAL; - goto fail; + if (frame_interval.numerator == 0 || frame_interval.denominator) { + frame_interval.denominator = IMX274_DEF_FRAME_RATE; + frame_interval.numerator = 1; } req_frame_rate = (u32)(frame_interval.denominator -- 2.27.0