Hi Greg,
On 6/14/20 9:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 01:39:18AM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> if (slot == -1) {
>> - dev_dbg(inst->core->dev, "%s: no free slot\n", __func__);
>> + VDBGH("no free slot for timestamp\n");
>
> Again, no, you just lost a lot of valuable information by changing to a
> different format (like driver, specific device, etc.). Please don't do
> this, it just makes the information less than before.
OK, one of the reasons to use pr_debug inside VDBGH macro is to avoid
having struct device *dev variable in every function with dev_dbg even
when the function doesn't use it.
Are you fine with s/pr_debug/dev_dbg in VDBGX macros?
--
regards,
Stan
