Hi Rob, On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 04:10:03PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:47:10 +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote: > > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The MAX9286 deserializes video data received on up to 4 Gigabit > > Multimedia Serial Links (GMSL) and outputs them on a CSI-2 port using up > > to 4 data lanes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > v7: > > - Collect Rob's RB tag > > - Remove redundant maxItems from remote-endpoints > > - Fix SPDX licence tag > > > > v10: > > [Jacopo] > > - Fix dt-validation > > - Fix dt-binding examples with 2 reg entries > > > > [Kieran] > > - Correctly match the hex camera node reg > > - Add (required) GPIO controller support > > > > .../bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max9286.yaml | 366 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 366 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max9286.yaml > > > > > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max9286.example.dt.yaml: example-0: i2c@e66d8000:reg:0: [0, 3865935872, 0, 64] is too long > > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1308280 > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above > error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date: > > pip3 install git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master --upgrade > I have updated my dt-schema installation to the latest github master ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Successfully installed dtschema-2020.6.dev8+g4d2d86c https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/commit/4d2d86c5cd65cd3944ce0aaa400866bc36727bea $ /usr/bin/dt-validate -V 2020.6.dev8+g4d2d86c ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- But I still cannot reproduce the error. However, I see this commit in your next branch https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/commit/b72500282cfd2eba6f9df4d7553f696544b40ee6 "schemas: Add a schema to check 'reg' sizes " Which sounds very likely related to the above reported error. Was this intentional ? I'm not sure how I should handle this. The error reports the i2c node parents should have both address-cells and size-cells properties set to 2, but in the example there is not i2c node parent at all :) Should I add a parent node for the i2c in the example snippet ? Thanks j > Please check and re-submit. >
