On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 15:28, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ulf, > > On 20.05.2020 15:12, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > + Greg > > > > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 14:54, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 20.05.2020 14:43, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >>> On 20/05/2020 12:22, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >>>> On 20.05.2020 11:18, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >>>>> On 20/05/2020 12:13, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >>>>>> On 20.05.2020 11:00, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >>>>>>> Commit 9495b7e92f716ab2bd6814fab5e97ab4a39adfdd ("driver core: > >>>>>>> platform: Initialize dma_parms for platform devices") v5.7-rc5 causes > >>>>>>> at least some v4l2 platform drivers to break when freeing resources. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> E.g. drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c uses > >>>>>>> vb2_dma_contig_set_max_seg_size() and > >>>>>>> vb2_dma_contig_clear_max_seg_size() to manage the dma_params, and > >>>>>>> similar pattern is seen in other drivers too. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> After 9495b7e92f716ab2, vb2_dma_contig_set_max_seg_size() will not > >>>>>>> allocate anything, but vb2_dma_contig_clear_max_seg_size() will still > >>>>>>> kfree the dma_params. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm not sure what's the proper fix here. A flag somewhere to indicate > >>>>>>> that vb2_dma_contig_set_max_seg_size() did allocate, and thus > >>>>>>> vb2_dma_contig_clear_max_seg_size() must free? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Or drop the kzalloc and kfree totally, if dma_params is now supposed > >>>>>>> to always be there? > >>>>>> Thanks for reporting this issue! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Once the mentioned commit has been merged, the code should assume that > >>>>>> the platform devices does have a struct dma_params allocated, so the > >>>>>> proper fix is to alloc dma_params only if the bus is not a platform > >>>>>> bus: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> if (!dev_is_platform(dev) && !dev->dma_parms) { > >>>>>> dev->dma_parms = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev->dma_parms), GFP_KERNEL); > >>>>>> > >>>>>> same check for the free path. > >>>>> There is also "amba: Initialize dma_parms for amba devices". And the > >>>>> commit message says PCI devices do this too. > >>>>> > >>>>> Guessing this based on the device type doesn't sound like a good idea > >>>>> to me. > >>>> Indeed. Then replace the allocation with a simple check for NULL > >>>> dma_parms and return an error in such case. This should be enough for > >>>> v5.8. Later we can simply get rid of those helpers and inline setting > >>>> max segment size directly to the drivers. > > That seems like a good idea, in the long run. > > > >>> Is that valid either? Then we assume that dma_parms is always set up > >>> by someone else. That's true for platform devices and apparently some > >>> other devices, but is it true for all devices now? > >> # git grep vb2_dma_contig_set_max_seg_size | wc -l > >> > >> 18 > >> > >> I've checked all clients of the vb2_dma_contig_set_max_seg_size > >> function. There are only 9 drivers, all of them are platform device > >> drivers. We don't care about off-tree users, so the proposed approach is > >> imho fine. > > Thanks for reporting and for looking into this. I apologize for the mess! > > > > There is one case, where the above solution could be a problem (unless > > I am wrong). That is, s5p_mfc_configure_2port_memory() that calls > > s5p_mfc_alloc_memdev(), which allocates/initializes an internal struct > > *device. Thus, this doesn't have the dev->dma_parms > > allocated/assigned. > Indeed, this one will fail. > > In other words, we would need to manage alloc/free for the > > dev->dma_parms to have a complete fix. Maybe in > > s5p_mfc_configure|unconfigure_2port_memory()!? > That would be the best place to allocate it. > > Additionally, I think reverting the offending commit, as discussed > > above, could cause even more issues, as it's even included for > > v5.6-stable kernels. I will go through all cases, more carefully this > > time, of how ->dma_parms is managed, to be sure there are no more > > conflicting cases. > > I've already posted a fix for ExynosDRM driver, which is also affected: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11559965/ Alright, thanks for helping out! Please add a fixes/stable tag to it. Fixes: 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms for platform devices") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Kind regards Uffe