Hi Ezequiel, Thanks for your reply ! On 2020/5/14 3:32, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 05:49, Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> When I cat module parameter 'dma_mode' by sysfs, it displays as follows. >> It is better to add a newline for easy reading. >> >> [root@hulk-202 ~]# cat /sys/module/tw686x/parameters/dma_mode >> memcpy[root@hulk-202 ~]# >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I don't mind this change, but I don't think this is standard. > The lack of newline follows what other drivers are doing. > > # hexdump -c /sys/module/acpi/parameters/ec_event_clearing > 0000000 q u e r y > 0000005 > > Is it really an issue for you? It's not an issue for me. It's just that if the result is in a separate line, it reads more easily. I am also planning to fix the parameters below '/sys/module/acpi/parameters'. Thanks, Xiongfeng > > Thanks, > Ezequiel > >> --- >> drivers/media/pci/tw686x/tw686x-core.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/tw686x/tw686x-core.c b/drivers/media/pci/tw686x/tw686x-core.c >> index 74ae4f0..bfc61da 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/pci/tw686x/tw686x-core.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/tw686x/tw686x-core.c >> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static const char *dma_mode_name(unsigned int mode) >> >> static int tw686x_dma_mode_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp) >> { >> - return sprintf(buffer, "%s", dma_mode_name(dma_mode)); >> + return sprintf(buffer, "%s\n", dma_mode_name(dma_mode)); >> } >> >> static int tw686x_dma_mode_set(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp) >> -- >> 1.7.12.4 >> >