Re: DM1105: could not attach frontend 195d:1105

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5 марта 2010 00:16:07 Hendrik Skarpeid wrote:
> Igor M. Liplianin skrev:
> > On 3 марта 2010 18:42:42 Hendrik Skarpeid wrote:
> >> Igor M. Liplianin wrote:
> >>> Now to find GPIO's for LNB power control and ... watch TV :)
> >>
> >> Yep. No succesful tuning at the moment. There might also be an issue
> >> with the reset signal and writing to GPIOCTR, as the module at the
> >> moment loads succesfully only once.
> >> As far as I can make out, the LNB power control is probably GPIO 16 and
> >> 17, not sure which is which, and how they work.
> >> GPIO15 is wired to tuner #reset
> >
> > New patch to test
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2721 - Release Date: 03/03/10
> > 20:34:00
>
> modprobe si21xx debug=1 produces this output when scanning.
>
> [ 2187.998349] si21xx: si21_read_status : FE_READ_STATUS : VSTATUS: 0x02
> [ 2187.998353] si21xx: si21xx_set_frontend : FE_SET_FRONTEND
> [ 2187.999881] si21xx: si21xx_setacquire
> [ 2187.999884] si21xx: si21xx_set_symbolrate : srate = 27500000
> [ 2188.022645] si21xx: si21_read_status : FE_READ_STATUS : VSTATUS: 0x01
> [ 2188.054350] si21xx: si21_read_status : FE_READ_STATUS : VSTATUS: 0x02
> [ 2188.054355] si21xx: si21xx_set_frontend : FE_SET_FRONTEND
> [ 2188.055875] si21xx: si21xx_setacquire
> [ 2188.055879] si21xx: si21xx_set_symbolrate : srate = 27500000
> [ 2188.110359] si21xx: si21_read_status : FE_READ_STATUS : VSTATUS: 0x02
> [ 2188.110366] si21xx: si21xx_set_frontend : FE_SET_FRONTEND
> [ 2188.111885] si21xx: si21xx_setacquire
> [ 2188.111889] si21xx: si21xx_set_symbolrate : srate = 27500000
> [ 2188.166350] si21xx: si21_read_status : FE_READ_STATUS : VSTATUS: 0x02
> [ 2188.166354] si21xx: si21xx_set_frontend : FE_SET_FRONTEND
>
> Since the tuner at hand uses a Si2109 chip, VSTATUS 0x01 and 0x02 would
> indicate that blind scanning is used. Blind scanning is a 2109/2110
> specific function, and may not very usable since we always use initial
> tuning files anyway. 2109/10 also supports the legacy scanning method
> which is supported by Si2107708.
>
> Is the use of blind scanning intentional?
Yes, of course, it's intentional. Why not?
User has freedom to make little errors in channels.conf file. Also the chip didn't support DVB-S2. 
And last, has who si2107/08 ? My chip is si2109.

-- 
Igor M. Liplianin
Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux