Hello Everyone, On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 10:07, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:27:22PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 19:06 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 4/29/20 6:59 PM, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote: > > > > Add missed ":" on kernel-doc function parameter. > > > > > > > > This patch fixes this warnings from `make htmldocs`: > > > > ./drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c:678: warning: Function parameter or > > > > member 'importer_ops' not described in 'dma_buf_dynamic_attach' > > > > ./drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c:678: warning: Function parameter or > > > > member 'importer_priv' not described in 'dma_buf_dynamic_attach' > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > > > > index ccc9eda1bc28..0756d2155745 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > > > > @@ -655,8 +655,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put); > > > > * calls attach() of dma_buf_ops to allow device-specific attach > > > > functionality > > > > * @dmabuf: [in] buffer to attach device to. > > > > * @dev: [in] device to be attached. > > > > - * @importer_ops [in] importer operations for the > > > > attachment > > > > - * @importer_priv [in] importer private pointer for the > > > > attachment > > > > + * @importer_ops: [in] importer operations for the > > > > attachment > > > > + * @importer_priv: [in] importer private pointer for the > > > > attachment > > > > * > > > > * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment pointer for this attachment. > > > > Attachments > > > > * must be cleaned up by calling dma_buf_detach(). > > > > > > > > > > Sumit said that he would be applying my patch from April 7: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/7bcbe6fe-0b4b-87da-d003-b68a26eb4cf0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > thanks. > > > > Sorry. I didn't check if the patch has already been sent. > > Sumit - patch from Randy is neither applied to drm-misc-next nor > drm-misc-fixes. > A reminder in case it was lost somewhere. My bad: I have now applied it to drm-misc-fixes, so should be seen in -next soon. > > Sam Best, Sumit.
