Hello,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:42:33PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the patchset.
>
> I'm also cc'ing Laurent who I think could be interested in this one.
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:01:49PM +0200, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> > Add min and max structures to the v4l2-subdev callback in order to allow
> > the subdev to return a range of valid frame intervals.
> >
> > This would operate similar to the struct v4l2_subdev_frame_size_enum and
> > its max and min values for the width and the height. In this case, the
> > possibility to return a frame interval range is added to the v4l2-subdev level
> > whenever the v4l2 device operates in step-wise or continuous mode.
>
> The current API only allows providing a list of enumerated values. That is
> limiting indeed, especially on register list based sensor drivers where
> vertical blanking is configurable.
>
> I guess this could be extended to cover what V4L2, more or less. If we tell
> it's a range, is it assumed to be contiguous? We don't have try operation
> for the frame interval, but I guess set is good enough. The fraction is
> probably best for TV standards but it's not what camera sensors natively
> use. (But for a register list based driver, the established practice
> remains to use frame interval.)
>
> I'm also wondering the effect on existing user space; if a driver gives a
> range, how will the existing programs work with such a driver?
>
> I'd add an anonymous union with the interval field, the other field being
> min_interval. Then the current applications would get the minimum interval
> and still continue to function. I guess compilers are modern enough these
> days we can have an anonymous union in the uAPI?
We can discuss all this, but given patch 3/3 in this series, I think
this isn't the right API :-) The sensor driver should not expose the
frame interval enumeration API. It should instead expose control of the
frame rate through V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE, V4L2_CID_HBLANK and
V4L2_CID_VBLANK.
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gomez <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h
> > index 03970ce30741..ee15393c58cd 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h
> > @@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval {
> > * @code: format code (MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ definitions)
> > * @width: frame width in pixels
> > * @height: frame height in pixels
> > + * @min_interval: min frame interval in seconds
> > + * @max_interval: max frame interval in seconds
> > * @interval: frame interval in seconds
> > * @which: format type (from enum v4l2_subdev_format_whence)
> > */
> > @@ -126,9 +128,11 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval_enum {
> > __u32 code;
> > __u32 width;
> > __u32 height;
> > + struct v4l2_fract min_interval;
> > + struct v4l2_fract max_interval;
>
> This changes the memory layout of the struct and breaks the ABI. Any new
> fields in the struct may only replace reserved fields while the rest must
> stay unchanged.
>
> > struct v4l2_fract interval;
> > __u32 which;
> > - __u32 reserved[8];
> > + __u32 reserved[4];
> > };
> >
> > /**
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
