Re: [RFC PATCH v10 6/9] media: tegra: Add Tegra210 Video input driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/25/20 5:41 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:

On 4/25/20 5:36 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


25.04.2020 12:36, Hans Verkuil пишет:
...
The media/tegra/ sounds a bit too generic, the media/tegra-vi/ path
should better reflect the driver, IMO.

It also should be better to name the compiled kernel module as tegra-vi,
IMO.

The driver name and the directory should be in sync, so either tegra-video or tegra-vi for both. I have no preference myself, as long as they are the
same.

This can be done as a follow-up patch.
Given that this driver isn't going to be reused by older pre-Tegra210
SoCs, perhaps it will also be worthwhile to name it as tegra210-vi or
tegra210-video.

Can you explain what do you meant by can't be reused for pre-tegra210 or for tegra186/194?

support for other tegra's can be added to same tegra-video driver. tegra-video host1x driver can be updated to add other tegra's vi and csi compatibles to host1x subdevs and vi and csi driver can be updated to add other tegra soc data and need to add coresponding tegra186/194/xxx.c file with tegra specific prog sequence

Same tegra-video.ko can be used for all tegra soc as driver supports adding other soc related as well.

Also was thinking instead of renaming media/tegra as media/tegra-vi, probably we can rename as media/tegra-video so it will be inline with module name we already chosen and also mainly we have vi and csi with in that so instead of tegra-vi probably we can use media/tegra-video?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux