Re: [PATCH 01/12] utils: fix compilation with C++98

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/04/2020 10:30, Rosen Penev wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Apr 23, 2020, at 1:19 AM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 22/04/2020 02:37, Rosen Penev wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> utils/cec-compliance/cec-test.cpp | 4 ++--
>>> utils/rds-ctl/rds-ctl.cpp         | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/utils/cec-compliance/cec-test.cpp b/utils/cec-compliance/cec-test.cpp
>>> index 032ff5ad..cc07998a 100644
>>> --- a/utils/cec-compliance/cec-test.cpp
>>> +++ b/utils/cec-compliance/cec-test.cpp
>>> @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ static int tuner_ctl_test(struct node *node, unsigned me, unsigned la, bool inte
>>>        cec_msg_give_tuner_device_status(&msg, true, CEC_OP_STATUS_REQ_ONCE);
>>>        fail_on_test(!transmit_timeout(node, &msg));
>>>        fail_on_test(timed_out_or_abort(&msg));
>>> -        info = {};
>>> +        memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>>>        cec_ops_tuner_device_status(&msg, &info);
>>>        if (!memcmp(&info, &info_vec[0], sizeof(info)))
>>>            break;
>>> @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static int tuner_ctl_test(struct node *node, unsigned me, unsigned la, bool inte
>>>        cec_msg_give_tuner_device_status(&msg, true, CEC_OP_STATUS_REQ_ONCE);
>>>        fail_on_test(!transmit_timeout(node, &msg));
>>>        fail_on_test(timed_out_or_abort(&msg));
>>> -        info = {};
>>> +        memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>>>        cec_ops_tuner_device_status(&msg, &info);
>>>        if (memcmp(&info, &(*iter), sizeof(info))) {
>>>            log_tuner_service(info);
>>> diff --git a/utils/rds-ctl/rds-ctl.cpp b/utils/rds-ctl/rds-ctl.cpp
>>> index 0511fe5d..0e497b2a 100644
>>> --- a/utils/rds-ctl/rds-ctl.cpp
>>> +++ b/utils/rds-ctl/rds-ctl.cpp
>>> @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ static void get_options(const int fd, const int capabilities, struct v4l2_freque
>>>                printf("\tFrequency range      : %.1f MHz - %.1f MHz\n",
>>>                     vt.rangelow / 16.0, vt.rangehigh / 16.0);
>>>            printf("\tSignal strength/AFC  : %ld%%/%d\n",
>>> -                std::lround(vt.signal / 655.35), vt.afc);
>>> +                lround(vt.signal / 655.25), vt.afc);
>>
>> v4l2-ctl-tuner.cpp also uses std::lround, but that one isn't changed back.
>>
>> Is rds-ctl.cpp perhaps just missing a header?
> Nope. std::lround is C++11.

So, why isn't v4l2-ctl-tuner.cpp changed to lround as well?

Regards,

	Hans

>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Hans
>>
>>>            printf("\tCurrent audio mode   : %s\n", audmode2s(vt.audmode));
>>>            printf("\tAvailable subchannels: %s\n",
>>>                    rxsubchans2s(vt.rxsubchans).c_str());
>>>
>>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux