On 4/7/20 7:54 AM, Sumit Semwal wrote: > Hello Paul, Hi Sumit, > > On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 00:03, Paul Blazejowski <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> While running `make oldconfig` CONFIG_DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY >> has a typo in Kconfig description, correct it. > > Thanks for your patch. > > May I request you to please run scripts/get_maintainer.pl while > submitting patches? This allows all interested people to be able to > review the patches. > You got it! I will send a new patch, fixing another misspelling ... thanks! >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Blazejowski <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig b/drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig >> index ef73b678419c..04dd09b1667b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig >> @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ config DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY >> bool "Move notify between drivers (EXPERIMENTAL)" >> default n >> help >> - Don''t pin buffers if the dynamic DMA-buf interface is available on both the >> + Don't pin buffers if the dynamic DMA-buf interface is available on both the >> exporter as well as the importer. This fixes a security problem where >> userspace is able to pin unrestricted amounts of memory through DMA-buf. >> - But marked experimental because we don''t jet have a consistent execution >> + But marked experimental because we don't jet have a consistent execution >> context and memory management between drivers. >> >> config DMABUF_SELFTESTS >> -- >> 2.26.0 >> > > Best, > Sumit. > Cheers! -paul