Hi Dafna, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 09:04:16PM +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote: > The value RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FMT_CTRL_SP_CB_CR_SWAP should be > set to the register instead of masking with ~BIT(1) > > Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-capture.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-capture.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-capture.c > index 5700d7be2819..84a3cf565106 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-capture.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-capture.c > @@ -469,8 +469,8 @@ static void rkisp1_sp_config(struct rkisp1_capture *cap) > if (cap->pix.cfg->uv_swap) { > u32 reg = rkisp1_read(rkisp1, RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FORMAT_CTRL); > > - rkisp1_write(rkisp1, reg & ~BIT(1), > - RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FORMAT_CTRL); > + reg = reg | RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FMT_CTRL_SP_CB_CR_SWAP; > + rkisp1_write(rkisp1, reg, RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FORMAT_CTRL); This indeed simplifies the code, but I think the logic is wrong in the first place. Shouldn't this be reg = rkisp1_read(rkisp1, RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FORMAT_CTRL); if (cap->pix.cfg->uv_swap) reg |= RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FMT_CTRL_SP_CB_CR_SWAP; else reg &= ~RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FMT_CTRL_SP_CB_CR_SWAP; rkisp1_write(rkisp1, reg, RKISP1_CIF_MI_XTD_FORMAT_CTRL); ? Same for patch 1/5. > } > > rkisp1_mi_config_ctrl(cap); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart