On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:07:05 +0100, hermann pitton wrote: > Are you still waiting for Daro's report? Yes, I am still waiting. Unfortunately neither Daro nor Roman reported any test result so far. Now, if we go for my second patch, I guess we might as well apply it right now. It only affects this one card (Asus P7131 analog), and it was broken so far, so I don't think my patch can do any bad. > As said, I would prefer to see all OEMs _not_ following Philips/NXP > eeprom rules running into their own trash on GNU/Linux too. > > Then we have facts. > > That is much better than to provide a golden cloud for them. At least I > won't help to debug such later ... > > If you did not manage to decipher all OEM eeprom content already, > just let's go with the per card solution for now. > > Are you aware, that my intention is _not_ to spread the use of random > and potentially invalid eeprom content for some sort of such auto > detection? > > The other solution is not lost and in mind, if we should need to come > back to it and are in details. Preferably the OEMs should take the > responsibility for such. > > We can see, that even those always doing best on it, can't provide the > missing informations for different LNA stuff after the > Hauppauge/Pinnacle merge until now. > > If you claim to know it better, please share with us. I'm not claiming anything, and to be honest, I have no idea what you're talking about. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
