Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:59:44 +0100
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>, Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@xxxxxxxxx>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxx>, Allen Hubbe <allenbh@xxxxxxxxx>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ntb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <90baef2d-25fe-fac4-6a7e-b103b4b6721e@suse.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:49:05AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> I just received a resend email from 3 weeks ago :/
> 
> Do you want me to merge the mgag200 patch into drm-misc-next?

Thanks but it depends on the first patch in the series so either it
could go with your ack through other tree or I will send it later (once
1st patch gets to mainline).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)
  - From: Thomas Zimmermann

References:
- [RESEND PATCH v2 0/9] iomap: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument
  - From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)
  - From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)
  - From: Thomas Zimmermann

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/8] media: imx: Miscalleanous format-related cleanups
Next by Date: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/9] iomap: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)
Previous by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)
Next by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Input] [Video for Linux] [Gstreamer Embedded] [Mplayer Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Yosemite Backpacking]