Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/15] videobuf2: do not sync buffers for DMABUF queues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On (20/01/10 11:30), Hans Verkuil wrote:
[..]
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > index 1762849288ae..2b9d3318e6fb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > @@ -341,8 +341,22 @@ static void set_buffer_cache_hints(struct vb2_queue *q,
> >  				   struct vb2_buffer *vb,
> >  				   struct v4l2_buffer *b)
> >  {
> > -	vb->need_cache_sync_on_prepare = 1;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * DMA exporter should take care of cache syncs, so we can avoid
> > +	 * explicit ->prepare()/->finish() syncs.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (q->memory == VB2_MEMORY_DMABUF) {
> > +		vb->need_cache_sync_on_finish = 0;
> > +		vb->need_cache_sync_on_prepare = 0;
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * For other ->memory types we always need ->prepare() cache
> > +	 * sync. ->finish() cache sync, however, can be avoided when queue
> > +	 * direction is TO_DEVICE.
> > +	 */
> > +	vb->need_cache_sync_on_prepare = 1;
> 
> I'm trying to remember: what needs to be done in prepare()
> for a capture buffer? I thought that for capture you only
> needed to invalidate the cache in finish(), but nothing needs
> to be done in the prepare().

Hmm. Not sure. A precaution in case if user-space wrote to that buffer?

+	if (q->dma_dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
+		q->need_cache_sync_on_prepare = 0;

?

	-ss



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux