> > that isn't just a leaf node of the spec. I think it's better to define > > 'resource' as a top level concept for virtio devices, even if the specifics > > of what a 'resource' is are defined by individual device types. > > Your patch doesn't define what a resource is though. It only refers to > something it calls 'resource' ... Reading it again, what I wrote was a little ambiguous. Stating things more clearly, the top level defines an 'exported resource' as a 'resource' associated with a uuid for the purpose of sharing between different virtio devices. It leaves the definition of what constitutes a 'resource' to individual device types. Perhaps it would be better to use 'object' or something instead of 'resource', to avoid the collision with virtio-gpu resources. -David
