On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:23 AM Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 07:09:07AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> > The PLL calculation routine checks the wrong variable name 'rate'
> > when it should be called '_rate' when checking to see whether or
> > not the PLL1 output frequency exceeds 1GHz.
> >
> > This patch changes it to the correct variable '_rate'
> >
> > Acked-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Why have you dropped the fixes tag you had in v1?
>
> Fixes: aa2882481cad ("media: ov5640: Adjust the clock based on the expected rate")
>
> I'm not the one who collects patches, so maybe wait for Sakari or Hans
> to tell you if you need to resend or not :)
It wasn't intentional. I couldn't find the original patch nor could I
find it in patchwork, so I re-did it from scratch and forgot.
(I have too many different computers)
I already sent a V3 before I read your e-mail. Sorry about that.
adam
>
> Thanks
> j
>
> > ---
> > V2: No code change. Only change commit description to be less confusing.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> > index 5e495c833d32..bb968e764f31 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> > @@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ static unsigned long ov5640_calc_sys_clk(struct ov5640_dev *sensor,
> > * We have reached the maximum allowed PLL1 output,
> > * increase sysdiv.
> > */
> > - if (!rate)
> > + if (!_rate)
> > break;
> >
> > /*
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
