On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:09:34PM +0100, Dmitry Sepp wrote: > Hello Gerd, > > Thank you for your feedback. > > There is no relationship between those. As I mentioned earlier. we have also > been working on a virtio video device at the same time. And there is no > relationship between the two specs. Keiichi, have you looked at the spec? I think it is useful to have a single device specification for all video functions given that there is a bunch of common stuff. Both encoder and decoder must negotiate video frame and video stream parameters for example. Also the virtio-video spec looks like a superset of virtio-vdec. Is there any important feature in video-vdec which is missing in virtio-video? > virtio-video: > 1. Uses the 'driver requests - device responses' model. > 2. Does not have the logical split of bitstreams and framebuffers, has only a > generic buffer object. Can you give a quick summary on buffer object management? thanks, Gerd
