Hi, > > Adding a list of common properties to the spec certainly makes sense, > > so everybody uses the same names. Adding struct-ed properties for > > common use cases might be useful too. > > Why not define VIRTIO devices for wayland and friends? There is an out-of-tree implementation of that, so yes, that surely is an option. Wayland needs (a) shared buffers, mostly for gfx data, and (b) a stream pipe as control channel. Pretty much the same for X11, except that shared buffers are optional because the X protocol can also squeeze all display updates through the stream pipe. So, if you want allow guests talk to the host display server you can run the stream pipe over vsock. But there is nothing for the shared buffers ... We could replicate vsock functionality elsewhere. I think that happened in the out-of-tree virtio-wayland implementation. There also was some discussion about adding streams to virtio-gpu, slightly pimped up so you can easily pass around virtio-gpu resource references for buffer sharing. But given that getting vsock right isn't exactly trivial (consider all the fairness issues when multiplexing multiple streams over a virtqueue for example) I don't think this is a good plan. cheers, Gerd
