Re: [PATCH 5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Ringel wrote:
> Am 08.02.2010 12:21, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> First, a few comments about your patch series:
>>
>> I've committed almost of your patches, and added an extra patch to make the
>> driver to compile it with -git. There were other broken things when compiling
>> against -git.
>>
>> Several of your patches are adding leading whitespaces. Please review them before
>> submitting. On -git, those whitespaces are shown with a red background color.
>>
>> I've re-made most of the patch descriptions. Please take a look on them and try
>> to improve on a next time.
>>
>> We've got 2 submission for each patches. I just discarded the older one.
>>
>> I've removed the two BEHOLDER board descriptions from one of your patches. It is
>> not related to your board, but it is another compilation fix.
>>
>> From your series, I didn't merge those 3 patches:
>>
>> [5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010                http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77451
>> [6/12] tm6000: tuner reset timeing optimation                           http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77459
>> [11/12] tm6000: bugfix firmware xc3028L-v36.fw used with Zarlink and    http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77462
>>
>> I'll send you separate comments why I didn't merge them, in reply to each email you've sent,
>> starting with this one (patch 5/12).
>>
>>
>> stefan.ringel@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>   
>>> From: Stefan Ringel <stefan.ringel@xxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c |  179 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>  1 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c
>>> index 7ec13d5..a2e2af5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c
>>> @@ -414,7 +414,15 @@ struct reg_init tm6010_init_tab[] = {
>>>  	{ REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0x3f, 0x00 },
>>>  
>>>  	{ REQ_05_SET_GET_USBREG, 0x18, 0x00 },
>>> -
>>> +	
>>> +	/* additional from Terratec Cinergy Hybrid XE */
>>> +	{ REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdc, 0xaa },
>>> +	{ REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdd, 0x30 },
>>> +	{ REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xde, 0x20 },
>>> +	{ REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdf, 0xd0 },
>>> +	{ REQ_04_EN_DISABLE_MCU_INT, 0x02, 0x00 },
>>> +	{ REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xd8, 0x2f },
>>> +	
>>>  	/* set remote wakeup key:any key wakeup */
>>>  	{ REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG,  0xe5,  0xfe },
>>>  	{ REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG,  0xda,  0xff },
>>> @@ -424,6 +432,7 @@ int tm6000_init (struct tm6000_core *dev)
>>>  {
>>>  	int board, rc=0, i, size;
>>>  	struct reg_init *tab;
>>> +	u8 buf[40];
>>>  
>>>  	if (dev->dev_type == TM6010) {
>>>  		tab = tm6010_init_tab;
>>> @@ -444,61 +453,129 @@ int tm6000_init (struct tm6000_core *dev)
>>>  		}
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	msleep(5); /* Just to be conservative */
>>> -
>>> -	/* Check board version - maybe 10Moons specific */
>>> -	board=tm6000_get_reg16 (dev, 0x40, 0, 0);
>>> -	if (board >=0) {
>>> -		printk (KERN_INFO "Board version = 0x%04x\n",board);
>>> -	} else {
>>> -		printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while retrieving board version\n",board);
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> +	/* hack */
>>>  	if (dev->dev_type == TM6010) {
>>> -		/* Turn xceive 3028 on */
>>> -		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6010_GPIO_3, 0x01);
>>> -		msleep(11);
>>> -	}
>>>     
>> The above is board-specific. It is needed for the tm6010 device I have here
>> (HVR900H), otherwise no xc3028 command will be handled.
>>
>> The better here is to add a setup routine to tm6000-cards and move all 
>> those GPIO codes to it. Then, add there your board-specific setup.
>>
>> I've added a patch that moves those GPIO board-specific setup to tm6000-cards:
>> tm6000_cards_setup(). Please move your board specific GPIO init to there.
>>
>>
>>   
>>> -
>>> -	/* Reset GPIO1 and GPIO4. */
>>> -	for (i=0; i< 2; i++) {
>>> -		rc = tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> -					dev->tuner_reset_gpio, 0x00);
>>> -		if (rc<0) {
>>> -			printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO1 reset\n",rc);
>>> -			return rc;
>>> -		}
>>> -
>>> -		msleep(10); /* Just to be conservative */
>>> -		rc = tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> -					dev->tuner_reset_gpio, 0x01);
>>> -		if (rc<0) {
>>> -			printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO1 reset\n",rc);
>>> -			return rc;
>>> -		}
>>> -
>>> -		msleep(10);
>>> -		rc=tm6000_set_reg (dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6000_GPIO_4, 0);
>>> -		if (rc<0) {
>>> -			printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO4 reset\n",rc);
>>> -			return rc;
>>> -		}
>>> -
>>> -		msleep(10);
>>> -		rc=tm6000_set_reg (dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6000_GPIO_4, 1);
>>> -		if (rc<0) {
>>> -			printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO4 reset\n",rc);
>>> -			return rc;
>>> -		}
>>> -
>>> -		if (!i) {
>>> -			rc=tm6000_get_reg16(dev, 0x40,0,0);
>>> -			if (rc>=0) {
>>> -				printk ("board=%d\n", rc);
>>> +		
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_4, 0);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +				
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_1, 0);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(50);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_1, 1);
>>> +		
>>>     
>> The above reflects the timing needed by your device. Depending on the board,
>> the sleep time may eventually be different.
>>
>>   
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x0e, 0x0010, 0x4400, buf, 2);
>>> +		
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		buf[0] = 0x12;
>>> +		buf[1] = 0x34;
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x0032, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>>> +
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		buf[0] = 0x00;
>>> +		buf[1] = 0x01;
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x00c0, 0x0000, buf, 39);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		buf[0] = 0x00;
>>> +		buf[1] = 0x00;
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x7f1f, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>>> +//		printk(KERN_INFO "buf %#x %#x \n", buf[0], buf [1]);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>>     
>> At the above, you're just trying to reproduce whatever the original driver does,
>> instead of relying on the i2c drivers.
>>
>> At the Linux drivers, we don't just send random i2c sequences in the middle of
>> the setup. Instead, we let each i2c driver to do the initialization they need
>> to do. 
>>
>> If you take a look on each call, for example:
>> 		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2);
>>
>> The first value determines the USB direction: 0x40 is write; 0xc0 is read;
>> The second value is the request. Both 0x0e (REQ_14) and 0x10 (REQ_16) are used for
>> i2c. From the past experiences, REQ_16 works better when the size is 1, where REQ_14
>> works better for bigger sizes.
>>
>> The third value gives the first byte of a write message and the i2c address. The lower
>> 8 bits is the i2c address. The above sequence is playing with several different 
>> i2c devices, at addresses 0x10, 0x32, 0xc0 and 0x1f.
>>
>> Most of the calls there are read (0xc0). I don't know any device that requires
>> a read for it to work. I suspect that the above code is just probing to check
>> what i2c devices are found at the board. The writes are to a device at address
>> 0x32 (in i2c 8 bit notation - or 0x19 at i2c 7bit notation).
>>
>> I suspect that the probe sequence noticed something at the address 0x32 and is
>> sending some init sequence for it. As this is not the tuner nor the demod, you
>> don't need those setup for your device to work. Also, this address is not typical
>> for eeprom. Without taking a look at the hardware, we can only guess what's there.
>> My guess is that it is for some i2c-based remote controller chip. We don't need
>> this for now. After having the rest working, we may need to return on it when
>> patching ir-kbd.i2c.
>>
>>   
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_4, 1);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +	    			TM6010_GPIO_0, 1);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_7, 0);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_5, 1);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +	
>>> +		for (i=0; i< size; i++) {
>>> +			rc= tm6000_set_reg (dev, tab[i].req, tab[i].reg, tab[i].val);
>>> +			if (rc<0) {
>>> +				printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while setting req %d, "
>>> +						 "reg %d to value %d\n", rc,
>>> +						 tab[i].req,tab[i].reg, tab[i].val);
>>> +				return rc;
>>>  			}
>>>  		}
>>> +			
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +	
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_4, 0);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_1, 0);
>>> +	
>>> +		msleep(50);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_1, 1);
>>> +		
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x0e, 0x00c2, 0x0008, buf, 2);
>>> +//		printk(KERN_INFO "buf %#x %#x \n", buf[0], buf[1]);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_2, 1);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_2, 0);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_2, 1);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_2, 1);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_2, 0);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>> +		tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN,
>>> +				TM6010_GPIO_2, 1);
>>> +		msleep(15);
>>>  	}
>>> +	/* hack end 
>>>     
>> The above sequence is device-specific. Please add your code after I patch
>> tm6000-cards.
>>
>> */
>>   
>>> +	
>>> +	msleep(5); /* Just to be conservative */
>>>  
>>> +	/* Check board version - maybe 10Moons specific */
>>> +	if (dev->dev_type == TM5600) {
>>> +		 board=tm6000_get_reg16 (dev, 0x40, 0, 0);
>>> +		if (board >=0) {
>>> +			printk (KERN_INFO "Board version = 0x%04x\n",board);
>>> +		} else {
>>> +			printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while retrieving board version\n",board);
>>> +		}
>>> +	}
>>> +	
>>>  	msleep(50);
>>>  
>>>  	return 0;
>>>     
>>   
> 
> I have a question, how can I implemented the reinit after activating
> demodulator when it use tm6000_cards_setup().

We'll need some function to change between analog and digital modes, doing the right
GPIO changes. See em28xx_set_mode() for a way of implementing it.

-- 

Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux