On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:57:09AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:44:50PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > The 2nd parameter of 'find_first_zero_bit()' is a number of bits, not of
> > bytes. So use 'BITS_PER_LONG' instead of 'sizeof(lanes_used)'.
> >
> > Fixes: 1fc3b37f34f6 ("media: v4l: cadence: Add Cadence MIPI-CSI2 RX driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > This patch is purely speculative. Using BITS_PER_LONG looks logical to me,
> > but I'm not 100% sure that it is what is expected here. 'csi2rx->max_lanes'
> > could also be a good candidate.
>
> Yeah, csi2rx->max_lanes would make more sense in that context. Could
> you resend a new version?
This is sort of unrelated, but for Smatch purposes the csi2rx->max_lanes
comes from the firmware in csi2rx_parse_dt() and it could be any u8
value.
I sort of wish that people would write code which was known to be
correct just from reading the kernel code, without looking at the
firmware... I guess I could mark v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse() as always
giving us valid data, but that still wouldn't tell us what the valid
data is. It's hard to know the right answer from a static analysis
point of view.
regards,
dan carpenter
