On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 09:02 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:05:08 -0700 > Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 16:57 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > The description at Documentation/process/license-rules.rst is very strict > > > with regards to the position where the SPDX tags should be. > > [] > > > PS.: I sent already a RFC version for those patches along with this > > > thread: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b32c2e46b91e7bcda2a9bd140673f06d71b2487a.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Nice, thanks. > > > > Now I guess I have to update checkpatch too. > > (unless you want to... ;) > > Yeah, it makes sense to update checkpatch too. Perhaps it could be > changed to use the "-s" flag on the check, instead of implementing > its own logic to handle the position. I think checkpatch needs its own logic as its source input is a patch file.
