Quoting Christian König (2019-08-21 13:31:45)
> @@ -117,17 +120,10 @@ i915_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> busy_check_writer(rcu_dereference(obj->base.resv->fence_excl));
>
> /* Translate shared fences to READ set of engines */
> - list = rcu_dereference(obj->base.resv->fence);
> - if (list) {
> - unsigned int shared_count = list->shared_count, i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) {
> - struct dma_fence *fence =
> - rcu_dereference(list->shared[i]);
> -
> - args->busy |= busy_check_reader(fence);
> - }
> - }
> + readers = dma_resv_fences_get_rcu(&obj->base.resv->readers);
> + dma_fence_array_for_each(fence, cursor, readers)
> + args->busy |= busy_check_reader(fence);
> + dma_fence_put(readers);
That's underwhelming, the full-mb shows up in scaling tests (I'll test
the impact of this series later). Something like,
do {
read = 0;
fences = dma_resv_fences_get_deref(&obj->base.resv->readers);
dma_fence_array_for_each(fence, cursor, fences)
read |= busy_check_reader(fence);
smp_rmb();
} while (dma_resv_fences_get_deref(obj->readers) != fences)
do {
fences = dma_resv_fences_get_deref(&obj->base.resv->fences);
write = busy_check_writer(fences);
smp_rmb();
} while (dma_resv_fences_get_deref(obj->writes) != fences)
args->busy = write | read;
Perhaps?
-Chris
