czw., 25 lip 2019 o 16:57 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:13 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This series makes DaVinci part of the multiplatform build for ARM v5. > > > > First three patches fix build errors spotted and fixed by Arnd with v1. > > > > The fourth patch adds necessary bits and pieces for davinci to support > > multiplatform build and the last one actually adds all davinci boards > > to multi_v5_defconfig. > > > > Tested on da850-lcdk with both multi_v5 as well as davinci_all defconfigs. > > > > v1 -> v2: > > - added patches from Arnd that fix build errors spotted when building > > random configurations (much appreciated) > > - rebased on top of v5.3-rc1 > > > Arnd Bergmann (3): > > staging: media/davinci_vpfe: fix pinmux setup compilation > > media: davinci-vpbe: remove obsolete includes > > davinci: fix sleep.S build error on ARMv4 > > > > Bartosz Golaszewski (2): > > ARM: davinci: support multiplatform build for ARM v5 > > ARM: multi_v5_defconfig: make DaVinci part of the ARM v5 multiplatform build > > > Thanks a lot for reposting the series! > > I wonder how we shoud deal with the dependencies now that the two media > patches got merged in the linux-media tree. > > It would be tempting to just merge the arch/arm/ changes, but that creates > a bisection problem when the vpbe driver is enabled. I don't care > about the staging driver really as that one is broken anyway, but including > the "media: davinci-vpbe: remove obsolete includes" fix would be better > here. > > Mauro, any idea for how to handle that? Should we apply an identical > patch to the davinci tree, or maybe only have it the ARM tree and you > drop it from your tree (I don't know if you have a rule against rebasing). > Sorry for not coordinating with Bartosz before I sent the patch again > earlier this week. > > > Arnd Hi Arnd, is there any action required from me for this series? Bart
