On 19/07/19 7:11 AM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote: >> Will it be better, if dvb_pll_devcount is decremented in dvb_pll_release(), instead of removing module params? > But you cannot know deterministically which device corrensponds to > what "id" (when you have multiple dvb_pll devices), > since "id" is dependent on the history of register and unregister > of dvb_pll devices. dvb_pll_release() frees fe->tuner_priv, and priv->nr is dvb_pll_devcount, but, decrementing count will only tell array has a free slot, and now if that free slot needs to be used it will have to either maintain free index list to be consumed next or convert array id to a list. > So I wonder about the benefit / practical usecase of "id" parameter. Ok, I will remove the module parameters and send a patch. Thanks, Vandana. > > -- > Akihiro
