Hi Aliasgar, Please state the driver in question in the Subject. So: [PATCHv2] staging/media/davinci_vpfe: fix style problems That way it is clear to reviewers which driver is modified. Also there is no need for '1/1' if there is only one patch. Regards, Hans On 6/21/19 6:34 AM, Aliasgar Surti wrote: > From: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@xxxxxxxxx> > > checkpatch reported "WARNING: line over 80 characters". > This patch fixes the warning for file davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c > > Signed-off-by: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > - Fixed styling as per suggestion in comments > > drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c > index 46fd818..e9c8de1 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c > @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ static int isif_validate_dfc_params(const struct vpfe_isif_dfc *dfc) > #define DM365_ISIF_MAX_CLVSV 0x1fff > #define DM365_ISIF_MAX_HEIGHT_BLACK_REGION 0x1fff > > -static int isif_validate_bclamp_params(const struct vpfe_isif_black_clamp *bclamp) > +static int > +isif_validate_bclamp_params(const struct vpfe_isif_black_clamp *bclamp) > { > int err = -EINVAL; > > @@ -593,7 +594,8 @@ isif_validate_raw_params(const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params) > return isif_validate_bclamp_params(¶ms->bclamp); > } > > -static int isif_set_params(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params) > +static int isif_set_params(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > + const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params) > { > struct vpfe_isif_device *isif = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd); > int ret = -EINVAL; >