Hello Alisgar, On 6/20/19 2:31 AM, Aliasgar Surti wrote: > From: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@xxxxxxxxx> > > checkpatch reported "WARNING: line over 80 characters". > This patch fixes the warning for file davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c > > Signed-off-by: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c > index 46fd818..e9c8de1 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c > @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ static int isif_validate_dfc_params(const struct vpfe_isif_dfc *dfc) > #define DM365_ISIF_MAX_CLVSV 0x1fff > #define DM365_ISIF_MAX_HEIGHT_BLACK_REGION 0x1fff > > -static int isif_validate_bclamp_params(const struct vpfe_isif_black_clamp *bclamp) > +static int > +isif_validate_bclamp_params(const struct vpfe_isif_black_clamp *bclamp) > { > int err = -EINVAL; > > @@ -593,7 +594,8 @@ isif_validate_raw_params(const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params) > return isif_validate_bclamp_params(¶ms->bclamp); > } > > -static int isif_set_params(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params) > +static int isif_set_params(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > + const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params) > { > struct vpfe_isif_device *isif = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd); > int ret = -EINVAL; When you resend a patch with some modifications you have done after receiving some feedback, don't forget to increase the version of your patch . One can do this by adding the `-v2` flag at `git format-patch` command. It is also a good practice to changelog what modifications you did bellow the `---` mark. Have a look at this v3[1]. And please read "Revising your patches"[2] for a complete documentation. Good hacking! André [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10999271/ [2] https://kernelnewbies.org/FirstKernelPatch