On 6/11/19 10:15 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 13:14 +0000, Matt Redfearn wrote: >> >> On 10/06/2019 14:03, Anders Roxell wrote: >>> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 12:13, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 6/6/19 11:47 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: >>>>> When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA and CONFIG_CODA_FS enabled as >>>>> loadable modules, we see the following warning: >>>>> >>>>> warning: same module names found: >>>>> fs/coda/coda.ko >>>>> drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko >>>>> >>>>> Rework so media coda matches the config fragment. Leaving CODA_FS as is >>>>> since thats a well known module. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile | 4 ++-- >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile >>>>> index 54e9a73a92ab..588e6bf7c190 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile >>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile >>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only >>>>> >>>>> -coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o >>>>> +video-coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o >>>>> >>>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += coda.o >>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += video-coda.o >>>> >>>> How about imx-coda? video-coda suggests it is part of the video subsystem, >>>> which it isn't. >>> >>> I'll resend a v2 shortly with imx-coda instead. > > I'd be in favor of calling it "coda-vpu" instead. Fine by me! > >> What about other vendor SoCs implementing the Coda IP block which are >> not an imx? I'd prefer a more generic name - maybe media-coda. > > Right, this driver can be used on other SoCs [1]. Good point. Regards, Hans > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg146498.html > > regards > Philipp >
