Hi Guillaume, I have a few questions/suggestions: On 5/15/19 9:04 PM, kernelci.org bot wrote: > media/master v4l2-compliance on vivid: 236 tests, 0 regressions (media_v5.1-2-16-gfc8670d1f72b) > > Test results summary > -------------------- > > V4L2 Compliance on the vivid driver. > > This test ran "v4l2-compliance -s" from v4l-utils: > > https://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/V4l2-utils I'd just link directly to the git repo instead of the wiki: https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git You should add the v4l-utils commit that's used to compile v4l2-compliance. That's important information to have. I assume that this test always uses the latest version of v4l-utils? > > See each detailed section in the report below to find out the git URL and > particular revision that was used to build the test binaries. > > > Tree: media > Branch: master > Kernel: media_v5.1-2-16-gfc8670d1f72b I assume this is the version of the host kernel, right? Perhaps calling this "Host Kernel:" would be less ambiguous. > URL: https://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git > Commit: fc8670d1f72b746ff3a5fe441f1fca4c4dba0e6f > > > 1 | qemu | arm64 | 118 total: 118 PASS 0 FAIL 0 SKIP > 2 | qemu | arm | 118 total: 118 PASS 0 FAIL 0 SKIP Even if everything was OK, I think it would still be useful to have a link to the full test report. Regards, Hans
