Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Adam wrote: >> Rather than document all this, isn't better to clean it up in the >> source? I can probably come up with a patch for this issue in fairly >> short order, if that's welcome. > > You're right, this is broken. For this to work it would have to get all > the details for the all the rc devices and find the one that has an > input device with that name. > > That command line above implies that the protocol is a property of the > input device which it is not. Actually I think the whole -d option is > misleading and not really useful. I think the right solution is to just > remove it completely. Ok, the patch looks good, I definately think this is a step in the right direction. In cases where there is multiple devices, one would select it with, for instance, '-s rc1' -- is that the intent? -- ...Adam Di Carlo...<a.p.dicarlo@xxxxxxxxx>............................
