This is not how ACPI tables are written. Add a deprecation note and refer to the proper documentation. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c index 27827842dffd..014b3f11e1ba 100644 --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c @@ -828,7 +828,10 @@ static int v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse(struct device *dev, * underneath the fwnode identified by the previous tuple, etc. until you * reached the fwnode you need. * - * An example with a graph, as defined in Documentation/acpi/dsd/graph.txt: + * THIS EXAMPLE EXISTS MERELY TO DOCUMENT THIS FUNCTION. DO NOT USE IT AS A + * REFERENCE IN HOW ACPI TABLES SHOULD BE WRITTEN!! See documentation under + * Documentation/acpi/dsd instead and especially graph.txt, + * data-node-references.txt and leds.txt . * * Scope (\_SB.PCI0.I2C2) * { -- 2.11.0