> -----Original Message----- > From: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Karicheri, Muralidharan > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 4:55 AM > To: Kevin Hilman > Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH - v3 4/4] DaVinci - vpfe-capture-converting ccdc > drivers to platform driver > > Arch patches are not usually merged in Hans tree. > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Hi Kevin and Murali, Sorry for jumping into this discussion so late, Can we use clk_add_alias() function exported by clkdev.c file here? With this board specific file can define aliases for all required platform_data keeping CLK() entry generic. Thanks, Vaibhav > Murali Karicheri > Software Design Engineer > Texas Instruments Inc. > Germantown, MD 20874 > phone: 301-407-9583 > email: m-karicheri2@xxxxxx > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 4:50 PM > >To: Karicheri, Muralidharan > >Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx; davinci-linux- > open- > >source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: Re: [PATCH - v3 4/4] DaVinci - vpfe-capture-converting > ccdc > >drivers to platform driver > > > >"Karicheri, Muralidharan" <m-karicheri2@xxxxxx> writes: > > > >> Can I remove it through a separate patch? This patch is already > merged in > >Hans tree. > > > >Hmm, arch patches should not be merged yet as I have not ack'd > them. > > > >Kevin > > > > > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >>>Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 2:44 PM > >>>To: Karicheri, Muralidharan > >>>Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx; davinci- > linux-open- > >>>source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>Subject: Re: [PATCH - v3 4/4] DaVinci - vpfe-capture-converting > ccdc > >>>drivers to platform driver > >>> > >>>"Karicheri, Muralidharan" <m-karicheri2@xxxxxx> writes: > >>> > >>>> Kevin, > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>OK, I'm not extremely familar with the whole video architecture > here, > >>>>>but are all of these drivers expected to be doing clk_get() and > >>>>>clk_enable()? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> [MK]Many IPs on DaVinci VPFE would require vpss master clock. > So > >>>> it is better to do the way I have done in my patch. So it is > expected > >>>> that clk_get, clk_enable etc are called from other drivers as > well. > >>> > >>>OK, then you are expecting to add clkdev nodes for the other > devices > >>>as well. That's ok. > >>> > >>>However, you still haven't answered my original question. > AFAICT, > >>>there are no users of the clkdev nodes "vpss_master" and > "vpss_slave". > >>>Why not remove those and replace them with your new nodes instead > of > >>>leaving them and adding new ones? > >>> > >>>Kevin > _______________________________________________ > Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list > Davinci-linux-open-source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open- > source -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
