Em Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:32:32 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Em Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:45:06 +0200 > Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > The test pattern could contain a different number of colour bars than > > eight, make the entry more useful by removing "Eight " from the name. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h > > index acb2a57fa5d6..88f2759c2ce4 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h > > @@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ enum v4l2_jpeg_chroma_subsampling { > > #define V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN (V4L2_CID_IMAGE_PROC_CLASS_BASE + 3) > > #define V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_DISABLED "Disabled" > > #define V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_SOLID_COLOUR "Solid Colour" > > -#define V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_VERT_COLOUR_BARS "Eight Vertical Colour Bars" > > +#define V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_VERT_COLOUR_BARS "Vertical Colour Bars" > > No, we can't do that. This is on an uAPI file. > > We should, instead, create another #define for non-eight vertical > color bars. > > Before you say, yeah, I agree that we messed this one, as the defined > name doesn't mention 8 bars... > > I would, instead, do something like: > > -#define V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_VERT_COLOUR_BARS "Eight Vertical Colour Bars" > +#define V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_VERT_8_COLOUR_BARS "Eight Vertical Colour Bars" > +#define V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_VERT_N_COLOUR_BARS "Vertical Colour Bars" > + > + /* Kept for backward-compatibility */ > +#define V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_VERT_COLOUR_BARS V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_VERT_8_COLOUR_BARS > > And, of course, update the documentation accordingly. Please ignore this comment. I didn't realize that those definitions don't exist yet at the uAPI file, and that this is a follow up for another patch: Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] media: Use common test pattern menu entries Next time, please put them into a patch series, as it makes easier for reviewers. Thanks, Mauro