Hello,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:00:25 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Weird, if I build directly from that tarball, then v4l2-compliance should say:
>
> v4l2-compliance SHA: not available, 64 bits
>
> So that's what I expect to see from buildroot as well.
Indeed, that's strange, I see that the v4l2-compliance Makefile does:
version.h:
@if git -C $(srcdir) rev-parse HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1; then \
echo -n "#define SHA " >$@ ; \
git -C $(srcdir) rev-parse HEAD >>$@ ; \
else \
touch $@ ; \
fi
which correctly uses $(srcdir), so it shouldn't go "up" the libv4l
build folder and pick up the latest Buildroot commit SHA1. I'll have a
quick look.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
