Hi Peter, On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:13:38PM +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote: > Thanks, works for the buildroot use case (disabling > bpf support unconditionally)... > > The reason to provide copies of the linux kernel headers in v4l-utils > is to be independent of old(-er) headers provided by toolchains? > > If so a copy of bpf_common.h is still needed (and the fallback, for > out of linux kernel usage, define for __NR_bpf in bpf.h enhanced for > all supported archs)? I have seen this problem on debian 7. Why do we care about compiling on something that ancient? Sean
