RE: [PATCH v7 06/16] intel-ipu3: mmu: Implement driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Sakari,

Thanks for the feedback.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 3:55 AM
> To: Zhi, Yong <yong.zhi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx;
> laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mani, Rajmohan
> <rajmohan.mani@xxxxxxxxx>; Zheng, Jian Xu <jian.xu.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>; Hu,
> Jerry W <jerry.w.hu@xxxxxxxxx>; Toivonen, Tuukka
> <tuukka.toivonen@xxxxxxxxx>; Qiu, Tian Shu <tian.shu.qiu@xxxxxxxxx>; Cao,
> Bingbu <bingbu.cao@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/16] intel-ipu3: mmu: Implement driver
> 
> Hi Yong,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 03:23:00PM -0700, Yong Zhi wrote:
> > From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This driver translates IO virtual address to physical address based on
> > two levels page tables.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static void call_if_ipu3_is_powered(struct ipu3_mmu *mmu,
> > +				    void (*func)(struct ipu3_mmu *mmu)) {
> > +	pm_runtime_get_noresume(mmu->dev);
> > +	if (pm_runtime_active(mmu->dev))
> > +		func(mmu);
> > +	pm_runtime_put(mmu->dev);
> 
> How about:
> 
> 	if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(mmu->dev))
> 		return;
> 
> 	func(mmu);
> 	pm_runtime_put(mmu->dev);
> 

Ack, unless Tomasz has different opinion.

> 
> > +}
> 
> --
> Sakari Ailus
> sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux