On 10/05/2018 03:52 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 11:54 -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
<snip>
+or bottom-top or alternate, and the capture interface field type is set
+to interlaced (t-b, b-t, or unqualified interlaced). The capture interface
+will enforce the same field order if the source pad field type is seq-bt
+or seq-tb. However if the source pad's field type is alternate, any
+interlaced type at the capture interface will be accepted.
This part is fine, though, as are the following changes. I'd just like
to avoid giving the wrong impression that the CSI does line interweaving
or pixel reordering into the output pixel format.
Agreed, I made the wording more clear.
Steve
