On 09/25/2018 03:20 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:04:21 -0700
Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
@@ -392,12 +406,11 @@ static int __v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_CUSTOM:
case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_DEVNAME:
case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_I2C:
- break;
case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE:
- if (v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
- notifier, asd->match.fwnode, i)) {
+ if (v4l2_async_notifier_has_async_subdev(
+ notifier, asd, i)) {
dev_err(dev,
- "fwnode has already been registered or in notifier's subdev list\n");
+ "asd has already been registered or in notifier's subdev list\n");
Please, never use "asd" on messages printed to the user. While someone
may understand it while reading the source code, for a poor use,
"asd" is just a random sequence of 3 characters.
I will change the message to read:
"subdev descriptor already listed in this or other notifiers".
Perfect!
But the error message is removed in the subsequent patch
"[PATCH 03/17] media: v4l2: async: Add v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev".
I could bring it back as a dev_dbg() in v4l2_async_notifier_asd_valid(), but
this shouldn't be a dev_err() anymore since it is up to the media platform
to decide whether an already existing subdev descriptor is an error.
Steve