On 18-09-13 18:36, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The parameters of v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu_items() are tricky: instead of
> the number of possible values, it requires the number of the maximum
> value. In other words, the ARRAY_SIZE() value should be decremented,
> otherwise it will go past the array bounds, as warned by KASAN:
>
> [ 279.839688] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in v4l2_querymenu+0x10d/0x180 [videodev]
> [ 279.839709] Read of size 8 at addr ffffffffc10a4cb0 by task v4l2-compliance/16676
>
> [ 279.839736] CPU: 1 PID: 16676 Comm: v4l2-compliance Not tainted 4.18.0-rc2+ #120
> [ 279.839741] Hardware name: /NUC5i7RYB, BIOS RYBDWi35.86A.0364.2017.0511.0949 05/11/2017
> [ 279.839743] Call Trace:
> [ 279.839758] dump_stack+0x71/0xab
> [ 279.839807] ? v4l2_querymenu+0x10d/0x180 [videodev]
> [ 279.839817] print_address_description+0x1c9/0x270
> [ 279.839863] ? v4l2_querymenu+0x10d/0x180 [videodev]
> [ 279.839871] kasan_report+0x237/0x360
> [ 279.839918] v4l2_querymenu+0x10d/0x180 [videodev]
> [ 279.839964] __video_do_ioctl+0x2c8/0x590 [videodev]
> [ 279.840011] ? copy_overflow+0x20/0x20 [videodev]
> [ 279.840020] ? avc_ss_reset+0xa0/0xa0
> [ 279.840028] ? check_stack_object+0x21/0x60
> [ 279.840036] ? __check_object_size+0xe7/0x240
> [ 279.840080] video_usercopy+0xed/0x730 [videodev]
> [ 279.840123] ? copy_overflow+0x20/0x20 [videodev]
> [ 279.840167] ? v4l_enumstd+0x40/0x40 [videodev]
> [ 279.840177] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x9f9/0x1ba0
> [ 279.840186] ? __pmd_alloc+0x2c0/0x2c0
> [ 279.840193] ? __vfs_write+0xb6/0x350
> [ 279.840200] ? kernel_read+0xa0/0xa0
> [ 279.840244] ? video_usercopy+0x730/0x730 [videodev]
> [ 279.840284] v4l2_ioctl+0xa1/0xb0 [videodev]
> [ 279.840295] do_vfs_ioctl+0x117/0x8a0
> [ 279.840303] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x211/0x2f0
> [ 279.840313] ? ioctl_preallocate+0x120/0x120
> [ 279.840319] ? selinux_capable+0x20/0x20
> [ 279.840332] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
> [ 279.840342] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x3d/0x50
> [ 279.840351] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x1c0
> [ 279.840361] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> [ 279.840367] RIP: 0033:0x7fdfb46275d7
> [ 279.840369] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 b1 48 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 81 48 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> [ 279.840474] RSP: 002b:00007ffee1179038 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> [ 279.840483] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffee1179180 RCX: 00007fdfb46275d7
> [ 279.840488] RDX: 00007ffee11790c0 RSI: 00000000c02c5625 RDI: 0000000000000003
> [ 279.840493] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 00000000009f0902
> [ 279.840497] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffee117a5a0
> [ 279.840501] R13: 00007ffee11790c0 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000000
>
> [ 279.840515] The buggy address belongs to the variable:
> [ 279.840535] tvp5150_test_patterns+0x10/0xffffffffffffe360 [tvp5150]
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Should there a Fixes: tag and also a fix keyword in the patch title?
Regards,
Marco
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> index b5d44c25d1da..133073518744 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> @@ -1633,7 +1633,7 @@ static int tvp5150_probe(struct i2c_client *c,
> 27000000, 1, 27000000);
> v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu_items(&core->hdl, &tvp5150_ctrl_ops,
> V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(tvp5150_test_patterns),
> + ARRAY_SIZE(tvp5150_test_patterns) - 1,
> 0, 0, tvp5150_test_patterns);
> sd->ctrl_handler = &core->hdl;
> if (core->hdl.error) {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
