Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 04:50:23 -0700
Cc: "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Arkver <ian.arkver.dev@xxxxxxxxx>, Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@xxxxxxxxx>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAL_JsqK8B46x8bm_aYggJSPAWrMGZ1rZ58uWCmyiSqA2KZpiFg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 15:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> A problem with MAINTAINERS is there is no way to tell who applies
> patches for a given path vs. anyone else listed.

try the --scm option

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
  - From: Rob Herring

References:
- [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
  - From: Rob Herring
- Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
  - From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
- Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
  - From: Rob Herring

Prev by Date: [GIT PULL for 4.20] Big V4L2 fwnode patchset
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Input] [Video for Linux] [Gstreamer Embedded] [Mplayer Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Yosemite Backpacking]

Powered by Linux