Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] media: ov5640: fix restore of last mode set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laurent, Steve,

On 09/07/2018 04:18 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello Hugues,
> 
> On Thursday, 16 August 2018 18:07:54 EEST Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
>> On 08/16/2018 12:10 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:19:46PM +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mode setting depends on last mode set, in particular
>>>> because of exposure calculation when downscale mode
>>>> change between subsampling and scaling.
>>>> At stream on the last mode was wrongly set to current mode,
>>>> so no change was detected and exposure calculation
>>>> was not made, fix this.
>>>
>>> I actually see a different issue here...
>>
>> Which problem do you have exactly, you got a VGA JPEG instead of a QVGA
>> YUYV ?
>>
>>> The issue I see here depends on the format programmed through
>>> set_fmt() never being applied when using the sensor with a media
>>> controller equipped device (in this case an i.MX6 board) through
>>> capture sessions, and the not properly calculated exposure you see may
>>> be a consequence of this.
>>>
>>> I'll try to write down what I see, with the help of some debug output.
>>>
>>> - At probe time mode 640x460@30 is programmed:
>>>
>>>     [    1.651216] ov5640_probe: Initial mode with id: 2
>>>
>>> - I set the format on the sensor's pad and it gets not applied but
>>>     marked as pending as the sensor is powered off:
>>>
>>>     #media-ctl --set-v4l2 "'ov5640 2-003c':0[fmt:UYVY2X8/320x240
>>>     field:none]"
>>>      [   65.611983] ov5640_set_fmt: NEW mode with id: 1 - PENDING
>>
>> So here sensor->current_mode is set to <1>;//QVGA
>> and sensor->pending_mode_change is set to true;
>>
>>> - I start streaming with yavta, and the sensor receives a power on;
>>>     this causes the 'initial' format to be re-programmed and the pending
>>>     change to be ignored:
>>>
>>>     #yavta -c10 -n4 -f YUYV -s $320x240  -F"../frame-#.yuv" /dev/video4
>>>     
>>>      [   69.395018] ov5640_set_power:1805 - on
>>>      [   69.431342] ov5640_restore_mode:1711
>>>      [   69.996882] ov5640_set_mode: Apply mode with id: 0
>>>
>>>     The 'ov5640_set_mode()' call from 'ov5640_restore_mode()' clears the
>>>     sensor->pending flag, discarding the newly requested format, for
>>>     this reason, at s_stream() time, the pending flag is not set
>>>     anymore.
>>
>> OK but before clearing sensor->pending_mode_change, set_mode() is
>> loading registers corresponding to sensor->current_mode:
>> static int ov5640_set_mode(struct ov5640_dev *sensor,
>> 			   const struct ov5640_mode_info *orig_mode)
>> {
>> ==>	const struct ov5640_mode_info *mode = sensor->current_mode;
>> ...
>> 	ret = ov5640_set_mode_direct(sensor, mode, exposure);
>>
>> => so mode <1> is expected to be set now, so I don't understand your trace:
>> ">     [   69.996882] ov5640_set_mode: Apply mode with id: 0"
>> Which variable do you trace that shows "0" ?
>>
>>> Are you using a media-controller system? I suspect in non-mc cases,
>>> the set_fmt is applied through a single power_on/power_off session, not
>>> causing the 'restore_mode()' issue. Is this the case for you or your
>>> issue is differnt?
>>>
>>> Edit:
>>> Mita-san tried to address the issue of the output pixel format not
>>> being restored when the image format was restored in
>>> 19ad26f9e6e1 ("media: ov5640: add missing output pixel format setting")
>>>
>>> I understand the issue he tried to fix, but shouldn't the pending
>>> format (if any) be applied instead of the initial one unconditionally?
>>
>> This is what does the ov5640_restore_mode(), set the current mode
>> (sensor->current_mode), that is done through this line:
>> 	/* now restore the last capture mode */
>> 	ret = ov5640_set_mode(sensor, &ov5640_mode_init_data);
>> => note that the comment above is weird, in fact it is the "current"
>> mode that is set.
>> => note also that the 2nd parameter is not the mode to be set but the
>> previously applied mode ! (ie loaded in ov5640 registers). This is used
>> to decide if we have to go to the "set_mode_exposure_calc" or
>> "set_mode_direct".
>>
>> the ov5640_restore_mode() also set the current pixel format
>> (sensor->fmt), that is done through this line:
>> 	return ov5640_set_framefmt(sensor, &sensor->fmt);
>> ==> This is what have fixed Mita-san, this line was missing previously,
>> leading to "mode registers" being loaded but not the "pixel format
>> registers".
> 
> This seems overly complicated to me. Why do we have to set the mode at power
> on time at all, why can't we do it at stream on time only, and simplify all
> this logic ?
> 

I'm not the author of this driver, Steve do you know the origin and the 
gain to do so ?
Anyway, I would prefer that we stabilize currently existing code before 
going to larger changes.

>> PS: There are two other "set mode" related changes that are related to
>> this:
>> 1) 6949d864776e ("media: ov5640: do not change mode if format or
>> frame interval is unchanged")
>> => this is merged in media master, unfortunately I've introduced a
>> regression on "pixel format" side that I've fixed in this patchset :
>> 2) https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg134413.html
>> Symptom was a noisy image when capturing QVGA YUV (in fact captured as
>> JPEG data).
> 
> [snip]
> 
BR Hugues.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux