On Tue 2009-12-15 15:29:51, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue 2009-12-15 15:14:02, Jon Smirl wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi! > >> > > >> >> (11) if none is against renaming IR as RC, I'll do it on a next patch; > >> > > >> > Call it irc -- infrared remote control. Bluetooth remote controls will > >> > have very different characteristics. > >> > >> How are they different after the scancode is extracted from the > >> network packet? The scancode still needs to be passed to the input > >> system, go through a keymap, and end up on an evdev device. > >> > >> I would expect the code for extracting the scancode to live in the > >> networking stack, but after it is recovered the networking code would > >> use the same API as IR to submit it to input. > > > > For one thing, bluetooth (etc) has concept of devices (and reliable > > transfer). If you have two same bluetooth remotes, you can tell them > > apart, unlike IR. > > IR has the same concept of devices. That's what those codes you enter > into a universal remote do - they set the device. They set the device _model_. > There are three classes of remotes.. > Fixed function - the device is hardwired > Universal - you can change the device > Multi-function - a universal that can be multiple devices - TV, cable, > audio, etc > > If you set two Bluetooth remotes both to the same device you can't > tell them apart either. Untrue. Like ethernets and wifis, bluetooth devices have unique addresses. Communication is bidirectional. Imagine wifi connected bluetooth. It is very different from infrared. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
