On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:39 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Works for me. Do you intend to apply it directly? Yes, I took it and it should be pushed out. > Yeah, some time ago mailing lists got flooded with some janitorial's > patchset adding includes (some claiming to be needed on some archs or > under some random Kconfigs)... Compile-test ended by adding more such > stuff (for a good reason, IMHO). I wonder if are there a better way to > handle includes without slowing builds. It's a nightmare to do by hand, with all the different architectures having slightly different header file requirements. The scheduler people did it last year (roughly Feb-2017 timeframe), and it was painful and involved a lot of build testing. Basically some <linux/sched.h> was split up into <linux/sched/*.h> I wouldn't encourage people to do that again without some tooling to actually look at "what symbols might get defined by header file collection XYZ, what symbols might I need with any config option" kind of logic. But it would be lovely if somebody *could* do tooling like that. Just having something you can run on C files that says "these headers are completely unused under all possibly config options and architectures" might be interesting. Because right now, most people tend to just copy a big set of headers, whether they need it or not. And they almost never shrink, but new ones get added as people add uses. Linus