On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 03:14:06PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thursday, 19 July 2018 11:42:08 EEST Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > -static int ov772x_mask_set(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command, u8 > > > > mask, > > > > - u8 set) > > > > -{ > > > > - s32 val = ov772x_read(client, command); > > > > - > > > > - if (val < 0) > > > > - return val; > > > > - > > > > - val &= ~mask; > > > > - val |= set & mask; > > > > - > > > > - return ov772x_write(client, command, val); > > > > -} > > > > - > > > > > > If I were you I would have kept these functions and wrapped the regmap > > > operations there. This is not an issue though if you prefer it this > > > way :) > > > > I have suggested this way. It is not a show stopper issue, but I still > > like this version better. > > Wrapping the regmap functions minimizes the diff and makes it easier to > backport the driver. May be, but using the regmap functions directly makes the driver cleaner. Most drivers have some kind of wrappers around the I²C framework (or regmap) functions; this one is one of the few to get rid of them. The two could be done in a separate patch, too, albeit I think the current one seems fine as such. -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx