On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:58 AM Hanna Hawa <hannah@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After some debug/bisect/diff, found that patch "softirq: Let ksoftirqd
> do its job" is problematic patch.
Ok, this thread died down without any resolution.
>- Using v4.14.0 (including softirq patch) and the additional fix
> proposed by Linus - no timeout issue.
Are you talking about the patch that made HI_SOFTIRQ and
TASKLET_SOFTIRQ special, and had this:
#define SOFTIRQ_NOW_MASK ((1 << HI_SOFTIRQ) | (1 << TASKLET_SOFTIRQ))
in it?
I think I'll just commit the damn thing. It's hacky, but it's simple,
and it never got applied because we had smarter suggestions. But the
smarter suggestions never ended up being applied either, so..
Linus
