> even when not used. I think it will also cause the compiler to emit warnings > for unused functions. I don't think that's a good idea. Where is my brown paper bag? :/ > > But if you insist on drivers/i2c/i2c-sccb.c, then it should be a > > seperate module, I'd think? > > Given how small the functions are, I wouldn't request that, as it would > introduce another Kconfig symbol, but I'm not opposed to such a new module > either. OK, let's keep it simple for now and introduce drivers/i2c/i2c-core-sccb.c and link it into the core module. It can still be factored out later if the need arises.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
