Hi,
I found it strange that the macros V4L2_CID_USER_MAX217X_BASE and
V4L2_CID_USER_IMX_BASE have equal value even though each of them state
that they reserved a range. Those reservations look conflicting to me.
The macro V4L2_CID_USER_MAX217X_BASE came first, and
V4L2_CID_USER_IMX_BASE was introduced in e130291212df ("media: Add i.MX
media core driver") with the conflicting assignment (not a merge error).
The authors of that patch mostly make up the recipient list.
Is such a conflict fixable at all given that it resides in a uapi
header?
Helmut
