On 06/13/2018 05:04 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 06/13/2018 06:14 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/12/2018 09:42 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
>>> int gntdev_dmabuf_imp_release(struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv, u32
>>> fd)
>>> {
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> + struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf;
>>> + struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>>> + struct dma_buf *dma_buf;
>>> +
>>> + gntdev_dmabuf = dmabuf_imp_find_unlink(priv, fd);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(gntdev_dmabuf))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(gntdev_dmabuf);
>>> +
>>> + pr_debug("Releasing DMA buffer with fd %d\n", fd);
>>> +
>>> + attach = gntdev_dmabuf->u.imp.attach;
>>> +
>>> + if (gntdev_dmabuf->u.imp.sgt)
>>> + dma_buf_unmap_attachment(attach, gntdev_dmabuf->u.imp.sgt,
>>> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>>> + dma_buf = attach->dmabuf;
>>> + dma_buf_detach(attach->dmabuf, attach);
>>> + dma_buf_put(dma_buf);
>>> +
>>> + dmabuf_imp_end_foreign_access(gntdev_dmabuf->u.imp.refs,
>>> + gntdev_dmabuf->nr_pages);
>>
>>
>>
>> Should you first end foreign access, before doing anything?
>>
> I am rolling back in reverse order here, so I think we first need
> to finish local activities with the buffer and then end foreign
> access.
Looking at gntdev_dmabuf_imp_to_refs(), the order is
dmabuf_imp_alloc_storage()
dma_buf_attach()
dma_buf_map_attachment()
dmabuf_imp_grant_foreign_access()
Or was I looking at wrong place?
-boris
