Hi Hans, On 08-06-2018 08:41, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Jose, > > I have not seen any updates for this series. What is the status? I thought we > were close to merging this... Good to hear from you! Hope you are doing fine! :) A colleague of mine is working on this right now. We expect to send a new series with some more features added. Thanks and Best Regards, Jose Miguel Abreu > > Regards, > > Hans > > On 12/15/2017 12:23 PM, Jose Abreu wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> On 13-12-2017 20:49, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>> On 13/12/17 15:00, Jose Abreu wrote: >>>> Indeed. I compared the values with the spec and they are not >>>> correct. Even hsync is wrong. I already corrected in the code the >>>> hsync but regarding interlace I'm not seeing an easy way to do >>>> this without using interrupts in each vsync because the register >>>> I was toggling does not behave as I expected (I misunderstood the >>>> databook). Maybe we should not detect interlaced modes for now? >>>> Or not fill the il_ fields? >>> As I mentioned above you as long as you get a good backporch value you >>> can deduce from whether it is an odd or even number to which field it >>> belongs and fill in the other values. So I think you only need to read >>> these values for one field. >>> >>> Filling in good values here (at least as far as is possible since not all >>> hardware can give it) will help debugging issues, even if you otherwise do >>> not support interlaced. >> Ok, I will fill the fields. >> >> Until the end of January I will be quite busy in another project >> so if you could review the remaining patches of this series I >> would appreciate very much ... This way when I have the time I >> can code all the changes and send them at once. >> >> Thanks and Best Regards, >> Jose Miguel Abreu >> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Hans >>
