Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think we should return to enforcing field order to userspace that > matches field order from the source, which is what I had implemented > previously. I agree with you that we should put off allowing inverting > field order. There is no any particular field order at the source, most of the time. The odd field is followed by the even field, and so on, sure. But there is no "first" and "second" field, any field can be the "first". The exception to this is a camera with a progressive sensor - both "fields" are taken at the same time and transmitted one after the other, so in this case the order is defined (by the camera, e.g. B-T on DV even with PAL version). But this isn't exactly PAL/NTSC. -- Krzysztof Halasa Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warsaw, Poland
